This is a technique of coronary artery bypass or CABG, wherein the entire operation is performed from the side of the chest (on the left) through an incision that is about 2 inches.
Conventional CABG or Coronary artery bypass requires the breast bone or sternum to be cut into half. Recovery from conventional bypass surgery requires a longer duration up to 8 weeks as the bone needs to heal. In MICS CABG, the operation is performed through the side of the chest wall, which mean no bones are cut. Healing is rapid and is usually complete in ten days.
Definitely yes! This is exactly the reason to do this operation. Hospital stay is a short as 2 days and most patients are back to normal or start work within 10 days.
No, they are not the same. MIDCAB is an old technique where only one or two vessels can be grafted. It is often confused-with the modern MICS CABG if one is unaware about recent developments.
Absolutely. The patient may be the ideal candidate for MICS as infection rates are almost epminated. The quality of the vessels will dictate whether the patient is suitable for this technique. The surgeon will be the best judge
The risk of infection is close to zero. All infections are reduced dramatically in MICS CABG even in diabetics
Yes. It could be the ideal option for this patient. It's best for the surgeon to take that decision along with the respiratory therapist.
No, not all patients with multivessel coronary blocks are candidates. Those with extensive disease or very poor heart function are not suitable for this technique. Your cardiac surgeon is the best person to decide whether you are a candidate for this operation.
No, not all cardiac surgeons are trained in MICS, Including ours,